Corrigendum to “Effects of supplementing a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product during the periparturient period on performance of dairy cows fed fresh diets differing in starch content” (J. Dairy Sci. 102:3082–3096)

Abstract

In Table 9, MUN values were incorrect. The correct values are shown in bold below.Table 9Effects of supplementation of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP) and carryover effects of starch content of fresh diets (ST) on DMI, BW and BCS changes, milk yield and composition during the post-fresh period (d 24 ± 3 to 44 ± 3 after calving), and the interval from calving to first ovulation postpartum1LS = low-starch fresh diets; HS = high-starch fresh diets; CON = control diet, no SCFP supplementation; SCFP = SCFP-supplemented diet.VariableLSHSSEP-valueCONSCFPCONSCFPSTSCFPST × SCFPDMI, kg/d20.719.920.619.80.470.770.100.98Initial BW,2Measured on d 23 and 24 ± 3 before morning feeding. kg5765785855889.940.330.780.94BW change, kg/d0.480.610.320.320.280.420.820.82Initial BCS2Measured on d 23 and 24 ± 3 before morning feeding.2.792.832.882.830.060.390.950.44BCS change,/21d−0.18−0.13−0.15−0.110.030.480.160.77Yield, kg/d Milk42.641.939.441.21.130.090.590.26 Fat1.561.661.601.630.050.910.210.46 CP1.211.241.181.240.030.640.230.64 Lactose1.981.951.871.960.060.340.530.28 Total solids5.165.275.055.240.130.630.260.78 3.5% FCM43.845.243.444.61.170.690.250.94 Solids-corrected milk39.640.939.340.51.040.770.220.963.5% FCM/DMI2.122.292.142.260.050.91<0.010.61Milk composition Fat, %3.74aMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.4.00abMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.4.05bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.3.95abMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.0.100.190.410.08 CP, %2.862.952.952.960.040.150.170.27 Lactose, %4.654.634.644.650.020.920.860.63 Total solids, %12.2aMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.12.6bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.12.6bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.12.5bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.0.130.090.260.08 MUN, mg/dL13.7abMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.13.9abMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.14.3aMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.13.1bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.0.410.760.230.09 SCC, 103 cells/mL37.4aMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.88.3abMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.164bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.55.5abMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.42.80.280.500.07Apparent dietary NEL3Calculated according to Dann et al. (2000). Mcal/d40.740.839.840.81.160.710.650.68 Mcal/kg of DMI1.982.071.962.070.050.840.050.86NEL balance,4Apparent dietary NEL (Mcal/d) minus NEL required for milk output and maintenance (Mcal/d). The NEL required for milk and maintenance were calculated according to Dann et al. (2000). Mcal/d2.351.361.601.550.740.750.560.59Days to FOP5Interval from calving to first ovulation postpartum (d).23.824.628.122.72.460.630.360.21a,b Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05) when an interaction of main treatment effect was observed.1 LS = low-starch fresh diets; HS = high-starch fresh diets; CON = control diet, no SCFP supplementation; SCFP = SCFP-supplemented diet.2 Measured on d 23 and 24 ± 3 before morning feeding.3 Calculated according to Dann et al. (2000).4 Apparent dietary NEL (Mcal/d) minus NEL required for milk output and maintenance (Mcal/d). The NEL required for milk and maintenance were calculated according to Dann et al. (2000).5 Interval from calving to first ovulation postpartum (d). Open table in a new tab The authors regret the error. Effects of supplementing a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product during the periparturient period on performance of dairy cows fed fresh diets differing in starch contentJournal of Dairy ScienceVol. 102Issue 4PreviewThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplementing a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP; NutriTek, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA) during the periparturient period (d −28 ± 3 to 44 ± 3 relative to calving) on dry matter intake (DMI), milk production, apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility, and postpartum ovarian activity of dairy cows fed fresh diets varying in starch content. From d 28 ± 3 before the expected calving date until d 44 ± 3 after calving, 117 Holstein cows were fed diets with SCFP (SCFP; n = 59) or without (control, CON; n = 58). Full-Text PDF Open Access