Abstract

M. N. Dyer has pointed out that the proof of the key Lemma on hopfian rings in w of [1] is incorrect. As I have been unable to find a correct argument, the results on pages 465-469 are moot. (Corollaries 2 and 3 on page 470 are true as it is easy to see that the lemma holds for any commutative ring, while the results in w use only Kaplansky's original theorem, and not the lemma.) I hope that some ring-theorist may be able to prove the lemma. In the first line of page 469, the map from /-/~(C*) to Homr (H2(C,I, F) given by the universal coefficient spectral sequence is, a priori, only a monomorphism. However the theorem is still true (without any essential change in the argument), modulo the lemma. A. Suciu has pointed out that the map �9 in line 1 of page 471 should be replaced by its square 4 2, to ensure that the mapping torus M be orientable. I am grateful to Dyer and Suciu for their observations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.