Corrigendum to “An Antinomy in Alexy's Theory of Balancing”

Abstract

Ratio JurisEarly View CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum to “An Antinomy in Alexy's Theory of Balancing” This article corrects the following: An Antinomy in Alexy's Theory of Balancing Giovanni B. Ratti, Volume 36Issue 1Ratio Juris pages: 48-56 First Published online: January 20, 2023 First published: 05 May 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12379AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL In Ratti 2023, the closing sentence of Section 5 of the article reads: “Indeed, if the theory of proportionality is assumed, the theory of principles cannot be accepted, and if the theory of proportionality is assumed, the theory of principles cannot be accepted.” The sentence should read as follows: “Indeed, if the theory of proportionality is assumed, the theory of principles cannot be accepted, and if the theory of principles is assumed, the theory of proportionality cannot be accepted.” Reference Ratti, G. B. 2023. An Antinomy in Alexy's Theory of Balancing. Ratio Juris 36(1): 48– 56. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12367. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation