Abstract
Abstract In this note I fix a mistake in my previous paper [5]: namely, the result concerning the uniqueness (up to isomorphisms) of such supergroups needs a new formulation and proof. By the same occasion, I explain more in detail the existence result which comes out of the construction of Chevalley supergroups.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
