Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00039.].

Highlights

  • In the original article, there was an error

  • The in-line equation for the signal-to-noise ratio in the presence of a fluorescence background was incorrectly printed as 1 − fb ∗SNR0, where it should have been printed as 1 − fb SNR0

  • A correction has been made to the Introduction, paragraph six: “Formally, the issue of single cell resolution can be described as follows: an optical signal from a cell of interest is compromised by shot noise generated by non-signaling fluorescence emanating from the membranes of other fluorescent cells and tissue autofluorescence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There was an error. The in-line equation for the signal-to-noise ratio in the presence of a fluorescence background was incorrectly printed as 1 − fb ∗SNR0, where it should have been printed as 1 − fb SNR0. 1 Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, 3 Centre for Neurotechnology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, 4 Institute for Systems Genomics, Stem Cell Institute, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, United States, 5 Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom A Corrigendum on Edited and reviewed by: Josef Bischofberger, Universität Basel, Switzerland

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.