Abstract

Physiological ReportsVolume 10, Issue 21 e15500 ERRATUMOpen Access Corrigendum: Pressure measurement characteristics of a micro-transducer and balloon catheters This article corrects the following: Pressure measurement characteristics of a micro-transducer and balloon catheters William MacAskill, Ben Hoffman, Michael A. Johnson, Graham R. Sharpe, Dean E. Mills, Volume 9Issue 8Physiological Reports First Published online: May 2, 2021 First published: 02 November 2022 https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15500AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL The authors of the article by William MacAskill et al. (2021) noticed an error in the figure legends of their article. The correct figure legends are as follows: Figure 2. Experiment 1 – in vitro: Ensemble average waveforms (each from 100 waves) from the micro-transducer catheter (MC), balloon catheter (BC) and reference (RP) pressures in response to chamber pressures of 25, 50, 75 and 100 cmH2O with a constant pressurisation time of 0.2 s. Figure 3. Experiment 2 – in vivo: Representative oesophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic pressure characteristics for the balloon catheters and micro-transducer catheter following cervical magnetic stimulation at 100% of stimulator power output. Three repeated twitches from one participant are shown superimposed. Stimulation artefacts are marked with an arrow (↑). Figure 4. Experiment 2 – in vivo: Oesophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic pressure amplitudes (top panels) and areas (bottom panels) for balloon catheters and micro-transducer catheter following cervical magnetic stimulation at increasing stimulation intensities. Data are mean ± SD and pooled from visits 1 and 2. Significant difference between catheters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). Figure 5. Bland–Altman plots of oesophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic pressure amplitudes (top panels) and areas (bottom panels) between balloon catheters (BC) and micro-transducer catheter (MC) following cervical magnetic stimulation at increasing stimulation intensities. Bias is represented by the solid line and the limits of agreement by the dotted lines (± 1.96 SD). Each participant has one datapoint per stimulation power and each datapoint was calculated as the mean value from visits 1 and 2. REFERENCE MacAskill, W., Hoffman, B., Johnson, M. A., Sharpe, G. R., & Mills, D. E. (2022). Pressure measurement characteristics of a micro-transducer and balloon catheters. Physiol Rep, 10, e14831. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14831 Volume10, Issue21November 2022e15500 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call