Abstract
Subsequently to the publication of the above article, the authors have realized that Fig.4E in their paper contained errors. The image selected to represent the experiment showing the UM‑UC‑3 cells of the siE2F3 group (0h) was chosen incorrectly during the figure compilation process. A corrected version of Fig.4 is shown opposite. Note that this error affected neither the interpretation of the data nor the reported conclusions of this work, and all the authors agree to this Corrigendum. The authors apologize to the Editor and the readership of the Journal for this unintentional error, and for any inconvenience caused. [the original article was published in Oncology Reports 36: 1293‑1300, 2016; DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.4923].
Highlights
To the publication of the above article, the authors have realized that Fig. 4E in their paper contained errors
A corrected version of Fig. 4 is shown opposite. Note that this error affected neither the interpretation of the data nor the reported conclusions of this work, and all the authors agree to this Corrigendum
The authors apologize to the Editor and the readership of the Journal for this unintentional error, and for any inconvenience caused
Summary
To the publication of the above article, the authors have realized that Fig. 4E in their paper contained errors.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
