Corrigendum for "Differential sensitivities of triple-negative breast cancer stem cell towards various doses of vitamin C: An insight into the internal antioxidant systems".

Abstract

In the published article, an unintentional error occurred in the caption of Figure 1: [Article in the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.29863]. Article first published online: 2 November 2020. The caption of Figure 1: “Isolation and characterization of cancer stem cells from TNBC lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. (A,B) FACS sorting of cancer stem cells as CD44 + and CD24 − cells from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. (C,D) Phase-contrast images of sorted cancer stem cells in culture. (E,F) Population doubling time (PDT) of sorted cancer stem cells. (G,H) Immunocytochemistry of WT and CSC population from MDA-MB-231. (I,J) Immunocytochemistry of WT and CSC population from MDA-MB-468. Scale bar = 100 μm. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, and represent at least three independent experiments. The differences between more than two groups were analyzed by oneway ANOVA followed by post hoc test (Bonferroni correction). The p > .05 (ns), <.05 (*), .01 (**), <.001 (***) were considered as significant. Error bar represents the ±standard error of the mean (SEM). ANOVA, analysis of variance; CSC, cancer stem cell; FACS, fluorescent activated cell sorting; MDA, malondialdehyde; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer” should be read as: “Isolation and characterization of cancer stem cells from TNBC lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. (A,F) FACS sorting of cancer stem cells as CD44 + and CD24 − cells from MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. (B, G) Phase-contrast images of sorted cancer stem cells in culture. (C, H) Population doubling time (PDT) of sorted cancer stem cells. (D, E) Immunocytochemistry of WT and CSC population fromMDA-MB-231. (I, J) Immunocytochemistry of WT and CSC population from MDA-MB-468. Scale bar = 100μm. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, and represent at least three independent experiments. The differences between more than two groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc test (Bonferroni correction). The p > .05 (ns), <.05 (*), .01 (**), <.001 (***) were considered as significant. Error bar represents the ±standard error of the mean (SEM). ANOVA, analysis of variance; CSC, cancer stem cell; FACS, fluorescent activated cell sorting; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer” The authors regret this error.