Abstract

Cosmic ray neutron (CRN) sensing allows for non-invasive soil moisture measurements at the field scale and relies on the inverse correlation between aboveground measured epithermal neutron intensity (1eV – 100 keV) and environmental water content. The measurement uncertainty follows Poisson statistics and thus increases with decreasing neutron intensity, which corresponds to increasing soil moisture. In order to reduce measurement uncertainty, the neutron count rate is usually aggregated over 12 or 24 h time windows for stationary CRN probes. To obtain accurate soil moisture estimates with mobile CRN rover applications, the aggregation of neutron measurements is also necessary and should consider soil wetness and driving speed. To date, the optimization of spatial aggregation of mobile CRN observations in order to balance measurement accuracy and spatial resolution of soil moisture patterns has not been investigated in detail. In this work, we present and apply an easy-to-use method based on Gaussian error propagation theory for uncertainty quantification of soil moisture measurements obtained with CRN sensing. We used a 3rd order Taylor expansion for estimating the soil moisture uncertainty from uncertainty in neutron counts and compared the results to a Monte Carlo approach with excellent agreement. Furthermore, we applied our method with selected aggregation times to investigate how CRN rover survey design affects soil moisture estimation uncertainty. We anticipate that the new approach can be used to improve the strategic planning and evaluation of CRN rover surveys based on uncertainty requirements.

Highlights

  • Specialty section: This article was submitted to Water and Hydrocomplexity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Water

  • A correction has been made to the Results and Discussion section, Experiment A (Fendt site), paragraph 2: “[. . . ] With the exception of sections 5, 9 and 10, all sections showed good agreement between the expected and measured uncertainty of soil moisture. [. . . ]”

  • A correction has been made to the Results and Discussion section, Experiment B (Selhausen site), paragraph 5: “[. . . ] the expected soil moisture estimation uncertainty using Selhausen site conditions (Figure 8) were similar to the overall uncertainty as expressed by the RMSE when only 3 measurements were used (0.032 m3/m3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Water and Hydrocomplexity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Water. Huisman 1, Martin Schrön 2, Justus Fiedler 1, Cosimo Brogi 1, Harry Vereecken 1 and Heye R. 1 Agrosphere Institute (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany, 2 Department of Monitoring and Exploration Technologies, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.