Abstract
Professor R. D. Brown has brought to our attention an error in our Theorem 4.2. This would, in turn, invalidate Theorem 3.6 which depends on Theorem 4.2. The basic flaw is that the alignment hypothesis of Proposition 4.1 is not satisfied by the product space projections, Qn. Interestingly, such product space constructions are a common computational device in applications of the T*T method, but apparently seldom satisfy the alignment hypothesis of Proposition 4.1. We wish here to correct these theorems, and comment on the resulting implications for Example 6.1. In independent and as yet unpublished work, Professor Brown has obtained further new results on convergence of the method of intermediate problems.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.