Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00897.].
Highlights
There was an error: one section of our review considers reagents traditionally considered to be anterograde tracers (i.e., fluorescent or antigenic substances that are taken up by neuronal cell bodies at the site of application and transported to the synaptic terminals)
In the original article, there was an error: one section of our review considers reagents traditionally considered to be anterograde tracers
The major limitations of conventional tracers are worthy of consideration: (1) Conventional tracers are taken up by fibers of passage (Dado et al, 1990; Chen and AstonJones, 1995; Conte et al, 2009), which can lead to incorrect identification of projections. [Notably, canine adenovirus (CAV) can be taken up by fibers of passage (Schwarz et al, 2015)]
Summary
There was an error: one section of our review considers reagents traditionally considered to be anterograde tracers (i.e., fluorescent or antigenic substances that are taken up by neuronal cell bodies at the site of application and transported to the synaptic terminals).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
