Corrigendum: A Student's Guide to Neural Circuit Tracing.

Christine Saleeba,Bowen Dempsey,Ann Goodchild,Sheng Le,Simon Mcmullan

doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00177

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00897.].

Highlights

There was an error: one section of our review considers reagents traditionally considered to be anterograde tracers (i.e., fluorescent or antigenic substances that are taken up by neuronal cell bodies at the site of application and transported to the synaptic terminals)
In the original article, there was an error: one section of our review considers reagents traditionally considered to be anterograde tracers
The major limitations of conventional tracers are worthy of consideration: (1) Conventional tracers are taken up by fibers of passage (Dado et al, 1990; Chen and AstonJones, 1995; Conte et al, 2009), which can lead to incorrect identification of projections. [Notably, canine adenovirus (CAV) can be taken up by fibers of passage (Schwarz et al, 2015)]

Summary

Introduction

There was an error: one section of our review considers reagents traditionally considered to be anterograde tracers (i.e., fluorescent or antigenic substances that are taken up by neuronal cell bodies at the site of application and transported to the synaptic terminals).

Results

Conclusion