Abstract
We regret that in our CrossTalk article (Patel et al. 2012) we made an incorrect reference to a study. The correct references refer to work carried out within the same group and the substance of our argument remains unchanged. The paragraph in question (p. 3393, bottom of third column) should read: Another objection to RMT in disease is that changes in respiratory muscle function and performance correlate poorly. Importantly, Ramírez-Sarmiento et al. found that despite architectural adaptation of the intercostal inspiratory muscles, there was no improvement in 6MWD following RMT (Ramírez-Sarmiento et al. 2002). In another study, RMT increased inspiratory muscle endurance in COPD patients, without improving any functional performance measure (McKeon et al. 1986). Similarly, when investigating expiratory muscle training in COPD (Mota et al. 2007), 6MWD improved substantially even though classical airway physiology dictates that, in COPD, increasing expiratory force cannot increase expiratory flow. The incorrect reference is Orozco-Levi et al. (1999). The correct references are Mota et al. (2007) and Ramírez-Sarmiento et al. (2002).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.