Abstract
A misuse of terminology has occurred in the statement and proof of Theorem 4.1 in our paper [Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), pp. 1981–1989] which caused some justifiable misinterpretation of this result. To recover this result we provide a new definition and give the statement of our result in terms of this definition. The proof of the new version is an improvement of the old proof. The effect of the new definition on further relevant results in our paper has been adopted in a remark.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
