Abstract

In this article I will compare different understandings of constitutionalism in contemporary constitutional theory: the so called neoconstitutionalism(s), popular constitutionalism and the new constitutionalism in Latin America. Specifically, I will explore the normative pretensions of each theory; the substantial and procedural models of democratic legitimacy that in my opinion support neoconstitutionalism, popular constitutionalism and new constitutionalism respectively; the institutionalization of judicial review proposed by each theory; the theories of democracy that are implicit in each model, and finally, how the relation between constitutional law and politics is conceived.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call