Abstract
Regional volumetric and local shape analysis has become of increasing interest to the neuroimaging community due to the potential to locate morphological changes. In this paper we compare three common correspondence methods applied to two studies of hippocampal shape in schizophrenia: correspondence via deformable registration, spherical harmonics (SPHARM) and minimum description length (MDL) optimization. These correspondence methods are evaluated in respect to local statistical shape analysis and structural subdivision analysis. Results show a non-negligible influence of the choice of correspondence especially in studies with low numbers of subjects. The differences are especially striking in the structural subdivision analysis and hints at a possible source for the diverging findings in many subdivision studies. Our comparative study is not meant to be exhaustive, but rather raises awareness of the issue and shows that assessing the validity of the correspondence is an important step.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
