Correspondence between the Terms and Defnitions of the International Standard ISO 21043-1-2018 and Terminology Developed by National Forensic Expertology

E V Chesnokova

doi:10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-44-49

Abstract

The issue of developing a uniform language for international communication in the feld of forensic science is considered. The matters of relative maturity of domestic forensic expert terminology and peculiarities of translated terms usage in forensic expertology and forensic practice are discussed. The concept of expertise subject formulated by modern leading scientists is analyzed, the conclusion is made about the subject of forensic examination as a process of establishing facts and circumstances, the purely applied nature of the concept, as well as the similarity to the defnition of expertise in the ISO international standard. Specifc examples are given. The need to translate some foreign standards into Russian and to adjust and implement several of their provisions in domestic legal system and expert practice to standardize forensic and expert activity is emphasized.

Highlights

The issue of developing a uniform language for international communication in the field of forensic science is considered
Correspondence between the Terms and Definitions of the International Standard ISO 21043-1-2018 and Terminology Developed by National Forensic Expertology
Приходим к пониманию необходимости более активного перевода международных стандартов в области судебной экспертизы на русский язык и активного внедрения их некоторых положений в экспертную практику после адаптации к нашей правовой системе

Summary

Introduction

The issue of developing a uniform language for international communication in the field of forensic science is considered. Взаимодействие в рамках международных конференций, в частности под эгидой Европейской сети судебно-экспертных учреждений (European Network of Forensic Science Institutes – ENFSI), по актуальным направлениям судебной экспертизы происходит с участием ученых, специалистов, судебных экспертов большинства стран Европейского союза и ряда других государств.

Results

Conclusion