Abstract
Zhao et al. (2003) have made an attempt to test and extend the hypothesis of Kroner et al. (1998) that the North China craton and the Southern India might have constituted part of a major active plate margin at the Archaean–Proterozoic boundary through correlation between Archaean and Proterozoic rocks of North China craton and the South Indian Block (SIB) and I welcome their effort. I am presently working on the Palaeoproterozoic volcano-sedimentary successions of the Singhbhum crustal province of the SIB as part of my ongoing research assignment and would like to make two comments:
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
