Abstract

The correlation structure of neural activity is believed to play a major role in the encoding and possibly the decoding of information in neural populations. Recently, several methods were developed for exactly controlling the correlation structure of multi-channel synthetic spike trains (Brette, 2009; Krumin and Shoham, 2009; Macke et al., 2009; Gutnisky and Josic, 2010; Tchumatchenko et al., 2010) and, in a related work, correlation-based analysis of spike trains was used for blind identification of single-neuron models (Krumin et al., 2010), for identifying compact auto-regressive models for multi-channel spike trains, and for facilitating their causal network analysis (Krumin and Shoham, 2010). However, the diversity of correlation structures that can be explained by the feed-forward, non-recurrent, generative models used in these studies is limited. Hence, methods based on such models occasionally fail when analyzing correlation structures that are observed in neural activity. Here, we extend this framework by deriving closed-form expressions for the correlation structure of a more powerful multivariate self- and mutually exciting Hawkes model class that is driven by exogenous non-negative inputs. We demonstrate that the resulting Linear–Non-linear-Hawkes (LNH) framework is capable of capturing the dynamics of spike trains with a generally richer and more biologically relevant multi-correlation structure, and can be used to accurately estimate the Hawkes kernels or the correlation structure of external inputs in both simulated and real spike trains (recorded from visually stimulated mouse retinal ganglion cells). We conclude by discussing the method's limitations and the broader significance of strengthening the links between neural spike train analysis and classical system identification.

Highlights

  • Linear system models enjoy a fundamental role in the analysis of a wide range of natural and engineered signals and processes (Kailath et al, 2000)

  • The Hawkes model was later used as a model for neural activity in small networks of neurons (Brillinger, 1975, 1988; Brillinger et al, 1976; Chornoboy et al, 1988), where maximum likelihood (ML) parameter estimation procedures can be used to estimate the synaptic strengths between connected neurons, but where no external modulating processes were considered

  • As can be seen in all of these examples, the analytically ­predicted correlation functions had a near-perfect match with the mean correlation functions of the simulated spike trains

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Linear system models enjoy a fundamental role in the analysis of a wide range of natural and engineered signals and processes (Kailath et al, 2000). GLMs are clearly powerful and flexible models of spiking processes, and are related to the popular Linear–Non-linear encoding models (Chichilnisky, 2001; Paninski et al, 2004; Shoham et al, 2005). They do not enjoy the same level of mathematical simplicity as their Hawkes counterparts – only approximate analytical expressions for the ­correlation and the spectral properties of a GLM model were derived (Nykamp, 2007; Toyoizumi et al, 2009) under fairly restrictive conditions, while exact parameters for detailed, heterogeneous GLM models can only be evaluated numerically (Pillow et al, 2008)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call