Abstract

THE opinion of Mr. Whipple, quoted at p. 2 of NATURE for November 2, to the effect that the solar outburst observed by Messrs. Carrington and Hodgson on September 1, 1859, was not the cause of the coincident magnetic perturbations, corresponds to my own conclusion in regard to the matter based upon evidence of an altogether different character. There was a recurrence of strong magnetic perturbations and auroras twenty-seven days later than the great magnetic storms of August 28 and September 1, 1859, thus following the general rule which is found to apply in such cases, there being a well-marked periodicity of such outbreaks at this precise interval corresponding to the time of a synodic rotation of the sun. Such recurrence manifestly could not exist if outbreaks upon the sun were able to produce terrestrial magnetic effects indifferently in all locations. In order that there may be recurrence at the synodic period the magnetic effects must proceed from the sun at some particular angle exclusively, and fortuitous outbursts elsewhere, no matter how violent, must fail to have any perceptible effect. In the estimation of the writer there is no point more important in connection with solar physics than the determination of this period and this angle with the greatest accuracy possible.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call