Abstract

BackgroundThe role of blood high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1) protein in predicting mortality of sepsis remains controversial. ObjectiveHere we conducted a meta-analysis to seek evidence for the association between blood HMGB-1 concentrations and mortality in patients with sepsis. MethodsEligible studies were identified by a comprehensive search of six digital databases, supplemented by a manual search of related references. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effect estimates. ResultsA total of eighteen studies, covering 1163 patients with sepsis, were included. Compared with survival groups of sepsis, non-survival groups had significantly higher blood HMGB-1 concentrations at enrollment (SMD: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21–0.69). Subgroup analyses showed that no significant differences were found between two groups among patients with more severe sepsis (SMD: 0.18, 95% CI: -0.02–0.38). A significant association between initial HMGB-1 levels and ≤30-day mortality remained (SMD: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.09–0.78). Besides, HMGB-1 levels were observed to be more significantly higher in non-survival groups after the third day of admission (SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05–1.62) but two groups attained comparable HMGB-1 levels on day 7 (SMD: 1.01, 95% CI: -0.31–2.33). ConclusionsInitial high blood HMGB-1 levels are significantly associated with short-term (≤30 days) mortality of patients with sepsis, and the association may be affected by the severity of sepsis. Subsequent monitoring of HMGB-1 levels, on the third and seventh day after admission, is encouraged for better evaluation of HMGB-1 as a prognostic marker of mortality in sepsis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.