Correlation of acetylator phenotype with peripheral, autonomic and central neuropathy in Northern Indian non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients

Abstract

Genetic susceptibility to diabetic neuropathy has been suspected and tentatively explored; however, diabetic autonomic and central neuropathies are poorly investigated areas. Previous trials correlating types of diabetes and diabetic neuropathy with acetylator dimorphisms have not been conclusive. The present study was designed to test peripheral neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy and integrity of central conduction pathways in patients of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and to correlate the findings with the acetylator phenotype. Twenty-six patients of NIDDM with stable glycaemic control and 11 age- and sex-matched control subjects were recruited, clinically examined and investigated with glycaemic and lipid profile, renal function tests, nerve conduction studies (sensory and motor), auditory brain stem evoked responses (ABERs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Acetylator status of the subjects was determined by sulphadimidine test. Out of 26 NIDDM patients, eight (30.7%; group 1A) were slow acetylators and 18 (69.3%; group 1B) were fast acetylators. The distribution of slow and rapid acetylators in both the groups was similar. Glycaemic and lipid profiles and 24-h urinary albumin excretion in groups 1A and 1B were also similar. Motor nerve conduction velocity, latency of F wave, sensory nerve conduction and amplitudes of sensory nerve action potentials were not different between fast and slow acetylator NIDDM patients. On testing for ABERs, there were no statistically significant differences in peak latencies of waves I, III and V; interpeak latencies (IPLs) I-III, III-V and I-V; amplitude of waves I, III and V on both sides between NIDDM patients and controls. However, peak latencies of wave III (P < 0.01), wave V (P < 0.005), IPLs I-III and I-V (P < 0.005), IPLs III-V (P < 0.05), and amplitudes of wave I (P < 0.05) and wave V (P < 0.05) on the left side were significantly different in slow acetylator NIDDM patients. Increase on the right side for the same group was statistically significant for IPLs I-III and I-V (P < 0.05). SEPs showed no statistically significant difference between NIDDM patients and controls, and slow and fast acetylator NIDDM patients. No significant association of acetylator status with peripheral neuropathy in NIDDM subjects was observed in the present study. However, central neural conduction, primarily tested by ABERs, was significantly delayed in slow acetylators compared with fast acetylator NIDDM patients. Hence, there may be a predisposition to neuropathy in this group of patients, and such a predisposition may be better detected by studying central rather than peripheral nervous conduction pathways in NIDDM patients.