Abstract
Enhanced modified moving average method (EMMAM) and correlation method (CM) for microvolt TWA identification are compared by aid of simulated ECG tracings (cases of absence of TWA and presence of stationary or time-varying TWA) and ECG recordings from healthy subjects (H-group) and patients who survived an acute myocardial infarction (AMI-group). The two competing methods were found to be equivalent when analyzing clean ECGs affected by stationary TWA. Non-stationary TWA is correctly tracked by the CM, whereas it is identified as stationary by the EMMAM. Moreover, the EMMAM suffers for its tendency to identify as TWA noise and other kinds of repolarization variability. Such limitation is most likely the cause of its false-positive TWA production. Finally, only the CM incorporates a local threshold criterion in the TWA detection algorithm which allows better discrimination between H and AMI groups, who are well known to be at increased risk to develop TWA.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
