Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are the most common cause of non-odontogenic pain in the maxillofacial region. Internal derangement (ID) is one of the most prevalent causes of TMDs, and disc displacement is recognized as the most common ID. The masticatory muscles are among anatomical structures involved in TMDs that may be affected by ID. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the masticatory muscle dimensions and ID of temporomandibular joints using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on the MRI images of 145 patients, retrieved from the archives of the MRI diagnostic and research center during 2020 - 2021. The patients were categorized into three main groups of normal disc position (NP) (n = 42), disc displacement with reduction (DDR) (n = 54), and disc displacement without reduction (DDWR) (n = 49). The maximum width and height of the masseter and medial pterygoid muscles and the maximum height and length of the superior and inferior heads of the lateral pterygoid muscle were measured on MRI images for each of the groups. Data were analyzed using t-test, Pearson’s correlation test, ANOVA test, and Tukey’s test (alpha < 0.05). Results: Significant differences were observed between the NP, DDR, and DDWR groups regarding the height (P < 0.001) and length (P < 0.001) of the superior head of the lateral pterygoid muscle; both parameters were significantly higher in the NP group, followed by the DDR and DDWR groups (P < 0.05). The dimensions of masticatory muscles were significantly greater in males than females (P < 0.05), except for the width of the medial pterygoid muscle (P = 0.064). The height of the masseter muscle (r = 0.190, P = 0.022) and the medial pterygoid muscle (r = 0.166, P = 0.046) was significantly correlated with age. Conclusion: Significant correlations were found between the height and length of the superior head of the lateral pterygoid muscle and ID of TMJ; the corresponding values were lower in the DDWR group compared to the DDR and NP groups, respectively.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call