Abstract

Aim. The aim of this paper is to define the correlation between social evaluation and personal well-being. Methods. The study involved the citizens of Chernihiv (average age – 31.5 years old): 91 people in total, 37 men and 54 women. The following methods were used: the scale of satisfaction with life scale by Diener, as adapted by Leontiev and Osin (2008); questionnaire of parameters of subjective social well-being by Danylchenko (2015); subjective life satisfaction scale by Lybyna (2008), questionnaire on the peculiarities of evaluation by other people by Danylchenko (2019). Results and conclusion. In Ukrainian society, the most important reference groups are parents and a spouse, while friends and colleagues play a comparatively smaller role. All these groups are more likely to give positive and neutral social evaluations. However, negative evaluations are more likely to come from colleagues and friends, and positive – from family. There are differences in indicators of subjective well-being, social acceptance (as a measure of social well-being) and competence between people who are assessed predominantly positively and predominantly negatively. Subjective well-being is reduced reproaches from reference groups. Praise contributes to the enhancement of subjective social well-being Comparison with other people and the existence of a role model reduces psychological well-being. The filter for the perception of positive and negative evaluations from the social environment is a person’s self-acceptance.

Highlights

  • We evaluate ourselves and the social world a dozen times each day

  • Praise contributes to the enhancement of subjective social well-being Comparison with other people and the existence of a role model reduces psychological well-being

  • The overall level of psychological well-being amounted to 217.9 points – 7 stanines, and its components ranged from 6 stanines to 7

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We evaluate ourselves and the social world a dozen times each day. Evaluations are an integral part of our lives and a regulator of our behaviour; they usually have both explicit and implicit effects on our consciousness. A study of the peculiarities of communication on social networks found that such type of communication can become a source of bad mood and irritation: 45% of respondents were jealous of friends whose posts provoked more reaction than theirs, while 45% were worried because no one “liked” their photo or there were less “likes” than they had expected (Zotova, 2017). There are several fields in psychology that study evaluation. The first is represented by socio-psychological research and relates to studying the forms of evaluative reactions from others (forms of expressing approval and condemnation: reproaches, accusations, praise, compliments, etc.). The second is represented by the cognitive research of processing social judgments, in particular positive prejudices and the construction of reference images. The third is dedicated to the study of cognitive (protective mechanisms, lowered selfesteem), behavioural (conformal or conflict behaviour) and affective (envy, pride) reactions to evaluative judgments

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call