Abstract

To evaluate the relationship between semiquantitative and volumetric parameters on 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT), including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), tumor to liver ratio (TLR) and tumor to mediastinum ratio (TMR) with the level of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 105 female patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT and had immunohistochemical staining to determine the level of Ki-67 expression. The following PET parameters were measured (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG, TLR and TMR) and correlated with level of Ki-67 expression. Significant moderate positive correlations were found between the PET parameters (primary SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG, TLR and TMR) and level of Ki-67 expression. The primary SUVmax had the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.461) followed by TMR (r = 0.455) and P value of <0.001 for both. In ROC analysis, primary SUVmax had the largest area under the curve (0.806, P = 0.0001), with sensitivity of 76.5 % and specificity of 75% for prediction of high Ki-67 level. In univariate analysis, all PET parameters, patient age, tumor grade, molecular subtype, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status were significantly associated with Ki-67 level. In multivariate regression analysis, only tumor grade [odds ratio (OR) = 20.460, 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.360-29.559, P = <0.0001], molecular subtype (OR = -21.894, 95% CI: -37.921 to -5.866, P = 0.008), SUVmax (OR = 2.299, 95% CI: 0.703-3.895, P = 0.005) and TLR (OR = -4.908, 95% CI: -9.476 to -0.340, P = 0.035) were found to be the strongest independent predictor factors for the level of Ki-67 expression and hence proliferative activity of malignant cells in breast cancer. The semiquantitative parameters and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT parameter, that is, TLG correlated well with proliferation marker Ki-67 in breast cancer. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging can be used as a useful noninvasive diagnostic tool in imaging cellular proliferation and hence may substitute for in vitro testing of molecular markers in the diagnoses and staging of breast cancer.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call