Abstract

BackgroundThe Japanese health care system has yet to establish structured training for primary care physicians; therefore, physicians who received an internal medicine based training program continue to play a principal role in the primary care setting. To promote the development of a more efficient primary health care system, the assessment of its current status in regard to the spectrum of patients’ reasons for encounters (RFEs) and health problems is an important step. Recognizing the proportions of patients’ RFEs and health problems, which are not generally covered by an internist, can provide valuable information to promote the development of a primary care physician-centered system.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review in which we searched six databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ichushi-Web, JDreamIII and CiNii) for observational studies in Japan coded by International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC) and International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) up to March 2015.We employed population density as index of accessibility. We calculated Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient to examine the correlation between the proportion of “non-internal medicine-related” RFEs and health problems in each study area in consideration of the population density.ResultsWe found 17 studies with diverse designs and settings. Among these studies, “non-internal medicine-related” RFEs, which was not thought to be covered by internists, ranged from about 4% to 40%. In addition, “non-internal medicine-related” health problems ranged from about 10% to 40%. However, no significant correlation was found between population density and the proportion of “non-internal medicine-related” RFEs and health problems.ConclusionsThis is the first systematic review on RFEs and health problems coded by ICHPPC and ICPC undertaken to reveal the diversity of health problems in Japanese primary care. These results suggest that primary care physicians in some rural areas of Japan need to be able to deal with “non-internal-medicine-related” RFEs and health problems, and that curriculum including practical non-internal medicine-related training is likely to be important.

Highlights

  • The Japanese health care system has yet to establish structured training for primary care physicians; physicians who received an internal medicine based training program continue to play a principal role in the primary care setting

  • Kaneko et al BMC Family Practice (2017) 18:87 (Continued from previous page). This is the first systematic review on reasons for encounters (RFEs) and health problems coded by ICHPPC and International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) undertaken to reveal the diversity of health problems in Japanese primary care

  • These results suggest that primary care physicians in some rural areas of Japan need to be able to deal with “non-internal-medicinerelated” RFEs and health problems, and that curriculum including practical non-internal medicine-related training is likely to be important

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Japanese health care system has yet to establish structured training for primary care physicians; physicians who received an internal medicine based training program continue to play a principal role in the primary care setting. Recognizing the proportions of patients’ RFEs and health problems, which are not generally covered by an internist, can provide valuable information to promote the development of a primary care physician-centered system. The Japanese health care system has yet to establish structured training for primary care physicians; physicians who received an internal medicine based training program continue to play a principal role in the primary care setting [3]. Miyazaki presumed that the less accessibility patients have to a specialist clinic and/or a secondary care hospital, the more diverse their RFEs and health problems in the primary care setting [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.