Abstract

BackgroundTo determine the correlation between the optic nerve head (ONH) circulation determined by laser speckle flowgraphy and the best-corrected visual acuity or retinal sensitivity before and after intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab for central retinal vein occlusion.MethodsThirty-one eyes of 31 patients were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab for macular edema due to a central retinal vein occlusion. The blood flow in the large vessels on the ONH, the best-corrected visual acuity, and retinal sensitivity were measured at the baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The arteriovenous passage time on fluorescein angiography was determined. The venous tortuosity index was calculated on color fundus photograph by dividing the length of the tortuous retinal vein by the chord length of the same segment. The blood flow was represented by the mean blur rate (MBR) determined by laser speckle flowgraphy. To exclude the influence of systemic circulation and blood flow in the ONH tissue, the corrected MBR was calculated as MBR of ONH vessel area – MBR of ONH tissue area in the affected eye divided by the vascular MBR – tissue MBR in the unaffected eye. Pearson’s correlation tests were used to determine the significance of correlations between the MBR and the best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity, arteriovenous passage time, or venous tortuosity index.ResultsAt the baseline, the corrected MBR was significantly correlated with the arteriovenous passage time and venous tortuosity index (r = -0.807, P < 0.001; r = -0.716, P < 0.001; respectively). The corrected MBR was significantly correlated with the best-corrected visual acuity and retinal sensitivity at the baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months (all P < 0.050). The corrected MBR at the baseline was significantly correlated with the best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months (r = -0.651, P < 0.001) and retinal sensitivity at 6 months (r = 0.485, P = 0.005).ConclusionsThe pre-treatment blood flow velocity of ONH can be used as a predictive factor for the best-corrected visual acuity and retinal sensitivity after anti-VEGF therapy for central retinal vein occlusion.Trial registrationTrial Registration number: UMIN000009072. Date of registration: 10/15/2012.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0211-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • To determine the correlation between the optic nerve head (ONH) circulation determined by laser speckle flowgraphy and the best-corrected visual acuity or retinal sensitivity before and after intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab for central retinal vein occlusion

  • Yamada et al reported that the mean blur rate (MBR) values in large ONH vessels measured by Laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) were correlated with the higher aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) [11]

  • According to the fluorescein angiography (FA) findings, the diagnosis of nonischemic CRVO was made in 26 eyes (Figs. 4 and 5), and the diagnosis of ischemic CRVO was made in 5 eyes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To determine the correlation between the optic nerve head (ONH) circulation determined by laser speckle flowgraphy and the best-corrected visual acuity or retinal sensitivity before and after intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab for central retinal vein occlusion. Laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) is a non-invasive method of real-time measurements of the blood flow on the optic nerve head (ONH), retina, and choroid [2,3,4,5,6]. It can measure the relative blood flow velocity, called the mean blur rate (MBR), that has been shown to be significantly correlated with the actual blood flow rate determined by the hydrogen gas clearance method and the microspheres technique [7, 8]. There has been no report that compared the ocular circulation before and after antiVEGF therapy for CRVO except for a report of 3 cases in which the statistical association between ONH circulation and visual function was not determined [13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call