Correlation between immature platelet fraction and reticulated platelets. Usefulness in the etiology diagnosis of thrombocytopenia

Abstract

Reticulated platelets (RP) are a surrogate marker for megakaryocytic activity, but the limitation of this determination is the lack of standardization of methodology. The determination of the immature platelet fraction (IPF) is performed in a simple, automated, and reproducible way between laboratories. We analyzed the correlation between IPF and RP, and usefulness of IPF in patients with thrombocytopenia. RP were determined by flow cytometry using double staining with thiazole orange and CD61 PerCP. IPF was performed with Sysmex XE2100 analyzer. We used a control group with normal platelets, and thrombocytopenic patients were classified into three groups: Group 1. Central thrombocytopenia, Group 2. Thrombocytopenia as a result of enhanced peripheral platelet destruction, and Group 3. Peripheral non-immune thrombocytopenia by abnormal distribution. Fourteen controls and 66 patients were analyzed. Group 1: 25 patients, they had mean and confidence interval 95% (95% CI) for IPF 8.67% (6.49-10.46%) and RP 4.08% (2.86-5.30%). Group 2: 20 patients, they had mean and 95%CI for IPF 16.80% (12.20-21.39%) and RP 16.14% (9.89-22.40%). Group 3: 21 patients, they had mean and 95% CI for IPF 9.04% (6.95-11.14%) and RP 5.23% (3.41-7.05%). The overall Pearson linear correlation between IPF and RP was r: 0.65. There were statistically significant differences in values of IPF and RP between Group 2 and the other two groups (P < 0.01). There is a good correlation between IPF and RP mainly in thrombocytopenia by peripheral destruction. Determination of IPF is an easy technique in their implementation, standardized and reproducible, so it could be a useful screening technique in patients with thrombocytopenia.