Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the assessments of scapholunate (SL) instability status on 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) using wrist arthroscopy as a reference standard. Thirty-three patients (16 men, 17 women; mean age, 48 ± 13 years) with suspected SL instability were evaluated prospectively with 4D-CT and wrist arthroscopy. Based on the arthroscopic testing of SL joint, 2 groups were defined: group 1 (n= 8) consisted of patients who had no, or slight, SL malalignment in the midcarpal space and group 2 (n= 25) consisted of patients who had moderate or severe SL malalignment. Two independent readers, who did not know the arthroscopic findings, used 4D-CT to evaluate the SL gap, lunocapitate angle (LCA), and radioscaphoid angle (mean and range values) during radioulnar deviation. The interobserver reliability was deemed good or excellent for most of the 4D-CT variables, except for the LCA range (moderate) and SL gap range (poor). For both readers, the SL gap mean, maximum, and minimum values were significantly higher (+67%,+78%, and+39%, respectively) and the LCA mean was significantly lower (-17%) in group 2 than in group 1. The radioscaphoid angle range values were lower (-34%) and the radioscaphoid angle mean values slightly higher (+4%) in group 2, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The SL gap range values were also higher (+86% for R1 and+40% for R2) and the LCA range values also lower (-50% for R1 and-31% for R2) in group2. Quantitative 4D-CT data corresponded well with the arthroscopic dynamic analysis of the SL joint in patients with suspected chronic SL instability. Diagnostic II.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.