Abstract
The utility of sperm DNA testing remains controversial. However, it may be helpful in couples with unexplained failures of multiple assisted reproductive techniques and/or recurrent abortions. This study analysed 10,400 spermatozoa of 26 patients for sperm-head morphology with high-magnification microscopy, DNA fragmentation and sperm chromatin decondensation. A significant negative correlation was demonstrated between sperm-parameters and abnormal sperm-head morphology as assessed by high magnification (score 0 according to this study’s classification): concentration ( r = −0.41; P = 0.03), motility ( r = −0.42; P = 0.03), morphology ( r = −0.63; P = 0.0008). No correlation was found with DNA fragmentation. However, the sperm chromatin-decondensation rate of score-0 spermatozoa was twice as high as the controls (19.5% versus 10.1%; P < 0.0001). This observation suggests that score-0 spermatozoa should not be selected for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. We analysed 10,400 spermatozoa of 26 patients for sperm head morphology at high magnification, DNA fragmentation and sperm chromatin decondensation. We demonstrated a significant negative correlation between sperm parameters: concentration ( r = –0.41; P = 0.03), motility ( r = −0.42; P = 0.03), morphology ( r = –0.63; P = 0.0008) and abnormal sperm head morphology as assessed by high magnification (score 0 according our classification). No correlation was found with DNA fragmentation. The sperm chromatin decondensation rate of score-0 spermatozoa was twice as high as than in controls (19.5% versus 10.1%; P < 0.0001). No significant relationship with sperm DNA fragmentation was observed. We suggest that high-magnification sperm selection could be an important step and a new tool for the clinician, who could decide to discard score-0 spermatozoa with a high risk of abnormal chromatin and select the best sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.