Abstract

BackgroundIn this study, we conducted a quantitative analysis of the clinical parameters of crown and gingival morphology (CGM) of the maxillary anterior teeth (MAT). We also analyzed the correlation of these parameters with periodontal biotype (PB), with a view to providing objective standards for PB diagnosis.MethodsThe three-dimensional (3D) maxillary digital models of 56 individuals were obtained using an intra-oral scanner. The following parameters were measured with the SpaceClaim software: gingival angle (GA), papilla width (PW), papilla height (PH), crown length (CL), crown width (CW), crown width/crown length ratio (CW/CL), bucco-lingual width of the crown (BLW), contact surface width (CSW), and contact surface height/crown length ratio (CS/CL). The PB were determined based on the transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival sulcus. Independent factors influencing PB were analyzed by logistic regression, and the optimal cutoff values for the independent influencing factors were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves).ResultsThere was no significant difference in the parameters of CGM of the MAT at the left and right sides. The thick biotype accounted for 69.6%, and the parameters of GA, PW, PH, CW, CW/CL and CS/CL were significantly correlated with PB (P ≤ 0.2). GA (odds ratio (OR) = 1.206) and PW (OR = 5.048) were identified as independent predictive factors of PB, with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.807 and 0.881, respectively, and optimal cutoff values of 95.95° and 10.01 mm, respectively.ConclusionThe CGMs of the MAT at the left and right side are symmetrical. The thin biotype accounts for a small proportion, and GA and PW are independent influencing factors of PB. GA of 95.95° and PW of 10.01 mm are the optimal cutoff values for categorization of individuals as thick biotype. This indicates that when the GA and PW of the right maxillary central incisor are G ≥ 95.95° and ≥ 10.01 mm, respectively, there is a higher probability that these individuals will be categorized as thick biotype.

Highlights

  • In this study, we conducted a quantitative analysis of the clinical parameters of crown and gingival morphology (CGM) of the maxillary anterior teeth (MAT)

  • Our results showed that among the thick biotype accounted for the largest proportion (69.6%) of the 56 study participants

  • Among the 56 participants included in this study, the thick biotype accounted for the largest proportion (69.6%), while thin biotype accounted for only 30.4%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We conducted a quantitative analysis of the clinical parameters of crown and gingival morphology (CGM) of the maxillary anterior teeth (MAT). It has been proposed that PB has an important influence on the treatment effect and prognosis of periodontal surgery, plantation and orthodontics [2,3,4]. De Rouck et al [5] measured intra-oral indexes including CW/CL, keratinized gingival width, and papilla height using calipers and a periodontal probe, and divided PBs into thin-scalloped biotype, Yin et al BMC Oral Health (2020) 20:59 thick-flat biotype and thick-scalloped biotype using the cluster analysis method. Stein et al [10] conducted intra-oral measurements of keratinized gingival width and gingival thickness using a periodontal probe, measured the CW/CL and papilla height using image analysis software, and explored the correlation of parameters such as gingival thickness and CW/CL. The correlation of PBs with maxillary margin and papilla width, in addition to the independent influencing factors of PBs, remain to be clarified

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call