Abstract

Immune response suppression is crucial for viral invasion. The protein VP24 is pivotal in achieving this in Ebola, although interestingly the mechanism of immune suppression is different in the closely related Marburg virus. Here, we illustrate that a possible molecular basis for this difference emanates from two alpha helical structures (α5 andα6) in VP24 involved in binding human karyopherin (KPNA) (PDBid:4U2X), wherein the Ebola and Marburg viruses have distinctly different charged properties inα5.α6 is absent in Marburg, and has a different hydrophobic moment in the Reston Ebola (REBOV) species, which is surprisingly non-pathogenic in humans. Based on the hypothesis that REBOV is not immunosuppressive, which is in turn is due to its inability to bind KPNA, we show by docking KPNA to the REBOV VP24 that the single amino acid substitution R140S is responsible for this difference between REBOV and Zaire Ebola strains. Such a scenario of getting a virulent REBOV through a single mutation is particularly worrisome, since the REBOV, once found only in monkeys, has been recently detected in pigs. We also reiterate the potential of using these helices as potential epitopes for generating protective antibodies against Ebola.

Highlights

  • Viruses from the family Filoviridae are negative-stranded RNA viruses having a filamentous shape[1]

  • We build on previous work that characterized AH structures in Ebola proteins to rationalize the lack of immunosuppressive properties in the Marburg VP24 (mVP24). Ebola (ZEBOV) virus VP24 (ezVP24) binds to Karyopherin alpha (KPNA) via two AHs (α5 and α5), loops and a residue on a β-sheet

  • We attribute the lack of immunosuppressive properties of mVP24 to its inability to bind KPNA, which emanates from different characteristics of mVP24 α5 compared to ezVP24 α5

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Viruses from the family Filoviridae are negative-stranded RNA viruses having a filamentous shape[1]. We showed that the AH from Ebola virus membrane fusion subunit GP213, which is disrupted by a neutralizing antibody derived from a human survivor of the 1995 Kikwit outbreak[14], has a very large hydrophobic moment compared to other AHs in Ebola proteins[12]. Another AH with the highest proportion of negatively charged residues is the binding site of the human karyopherin (KPNA) to the Zaire Ebola (ZEBOV) virus VP24 (ezVP24) protein[15]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call