Abstract
In the above article [1] , the proposed Methods, Results, and Conclusions remain unchanged.
Highlights
Subsection B and Subsubsection 2), the second last paragraph says, ‘‘The maximum distance between any two damage edge points represents the length of semi-major axis, a, while, the minimum distance between any two edge points represents the length of semi-minor axis, b, of an ellipse, as follows.’’ Based on this statement, the two equations presented afterward should not have 2 in the denominator
Some of the reference numbers were not updated in the main body of the paper when additional papers were cited in the revised manuscript
There is no change in the References list or body text, only the reference numbers in the text are corrected as follows: Start of the third paragraph of Section I with the correct referencing should be read as, ‘‘In the aforementioned methods, the researchers mostly simulated the defects using circular [3], [4], [10], [11], [14], [15], [19], [25], [27]–[29], square [13], [30], and rectangular [16], [18], [24] shapes, which may not be the best representation of the actual damage in composite laminates
Summary
Some of the reference numbers were not updated in the main body of the paper when additional papers were cited in the revised manuscript.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
