Abstract
An error in the proof of Corollary 6.2 of [1] has been pointed out by Gerard Ben-Arous. The computation of M(x,λ) in the case λo = 0 on p. 243 is incorrect, because M(x,λ) = 0 when λ0 = 0 and λjg (x) = 0 for all k. (There is also a factor of missing in the formula as stated for λ0 φ 0, but this is not significant.) Thus when applying the Pontryagin Theorem (Theorem 6.1) it is necessary to consider one additional case: λo = 0 and M(x9λ) = 0 along the curve. The conditions of the theorem in this case lead to the equations
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
