Abstract
In the above article <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">[1]</xref> , we did not check the article carefully enough, which resulted in writing errors in some parts of the paper. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Table 1</xref> of the original article, we incorrectly wrote the default charging efficiency of MC as 300 mJ/s, but the correct charging efficiency is 3000 mJ/s. Also, in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Figure 8</xref> of the original article, we incorrectly wrote the coordinate range of X-axis as 50 mJ/s–500 mJ/s, while the correct coordinate range is 500 mJ/s–5000 mJ/s. These errors are writing errors and have no impact on the core content of the article, such as experimental methods and conclusions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.