Abstract
In the above article [1], one error, (1), was found which has an impact on the results and interpretation of the image quality that was described in four sentences, (2)-(5). This correction does not mitigate the overall conclusion of this work, but does positively support improvements of the proposed method (multi-perspective ultrafast imaging) in comparison with the standard method (focused line-by-line imaging).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
