Abstract

In the above article <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">[1]</xref> , we correct errors in Section III-B. The corrections are related to the joint distribution of the inputs to the main decoder which corresponds to a branch in the code trellis for the main decoder. Note that as far as the distribution of the input corresponding to a single code symbol is concerned, the results in Section III-B are correct. We have noticed that <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\alpha$ </tex-math></inline-formula> in Proposition 12 ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\beta$ </tex-math></inline-formula> in Proposition 14) has another meaning, which has made it possible to derive the joint distribution of the inputs corresponding to the whole branch. Corrections are based on this important observation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call