Correction.

Abstract

AnaesthesiaVolume 72, Issue 11 p. 1427-1427 CorrectionsFree Access Correction This article corrects the following: Comparison of reversal with neostigmine of low-dose rocuronium vs. reversal with sugammadex of high-dose rocuronium for a short procedure E. S. Choi, A. Y. Oh, B. W. Koo, J. W. Hwang, J. W. Han, K. S. Seo, S. H. Ahn, W. J. Jeong, Volume 72Issue 10Anaesthesia pages: 1185-1190 First Published online: May 11, 2017 First published: 19 October 2017 https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14107AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL In the article by Choi et al. 1, there were 2 errors in the following sentence in the Summary section (indicated by underline): The onset of neuromuscular block was more rapid, and intubation conditions and ease of intra-operative laryngoscopy were more favourable, and the satisfaction score was lower in the moderate block group compared with the deep block group. The correct sentence should be: The onset of neuromuscular block was slower, and intubation conditions and ease of intra-operative laryngoscopy were less favourable, and the satisfaction score was lower in the moderate block group compared with the deep block group. Reference 1Choi ES, Oh AY, Koo BW, et al. Comparison of reversal with neostigmine of low-dose rocuronium vs. reversal with sugammadex of high-dose rocuronium for a short procedure. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 1185– 90. Volume72, Issue11November 2017Pages 1427-1427 ReferencesRelatedInformation