Abstract
The following corrections should be made to this article. In Theorem 9 and Theorem 11, one needs to add the assumption that the admissible feedback function σ is globally Lipschitz continuous. If we denote the globally Lipschitz constant by k, then in the proofs of Theorems 9 and 11 the definition of r should be omitted and the constant kr replaced by k. Otherwise, the K∞-function candidate for the functions ρ in (7) would depend on the solution x and the disturbance d in both theorems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
