Abstract
Our arguments in §6 of the paper [3] contain an error. In this note we explain the error and how to fix it. We are grateful to Florent Ygouf for both pointing out the mistake, and for indicating the correct argument included below. All of the results stated in the introduction of the paper remain valid, as a consequence of the amended argument which will be given below. In the recent preprint [4], Ygouf proves related results about existence of dense rel leaves in other loci.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
