Abstract

You have accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Jacoby David M. P., Siriwat Penthai, Freeman Robin and Carbone Chris 2016Correction to ‘Is the scaling of swim speed in sharks driven by metabolism?’Biol. Lett.122016077520160775http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0775SectionYou have accessCorrectionCorrection to ‘Is the scaling of swim speed in sharks driven by metabolism?’ David M. P. Jacoby David M. P. Jacoby Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Penthai Siriwat Penthai Siriwat Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Robin Freeman Robin Freeman Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Chris Carbone Chris Carbone Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author David M. P. Jacoby David M. P. Jacoby Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Penthai Siriwat Penthai Siriwat Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Robin Freeman Robin Freeman Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Chris Carbone Chris Carbone Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Published:01 October 2016https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0775This article corrects the followingResearch ArticleIs the scaling of swim speed in sharks driven by metabolism?https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0781 David M. P. Jacoby, Penthai Siriwat, Robin Freeman and Chris Carbone volume 11issue 12Biology Letters01 December 2015Biol. Lett.11, 20150781 (Published online 2 December 2015). (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0781)Following publication of our article, we acknowledge that there was an error in our extrapolated cruising speed for the megalodon shark. Our estimate of 5.04 m s−1 should have been 1.34 m s−1. However, we note that this corrected estimate for a 48 tonne individual may be low as its mass has been estimated as high as 100 tonnes [1].This correction refers to a swim speed estimate for this extinct species only and does not influence the main analyses presented in our paper.Footnotes© 2016 The Author(s)Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.ReferencesReference1Gottfried MD, Compagno LJV, Bowman SC. 1996Size and skeletal anatomy of the giant ‘megatooth’ shark Carcharodon megalodon. In Great white sharks: the biology of Carcharodon carcharias (eds Klimley AP, Ainley DA), pp. 55–66. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc. Crossref, Google Scholar Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Ferrón H and Vermeij G (2017) Regional endothermy as a trigger for gigantism in some extinct macropredatory sharks, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0185185, 12:9, (e0185185) Related articlesIs the scaling of swim speed in sharks driven by metabolism?01 December 2015Biology Letters This IssueOctober 2016Volume 12Issue 10 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0775PubMed:28120812Published by:Royal SocietyOnline ISSN:1744-957XHistory: Published online01/10/2016Published in print31/10/2016 License:© 2016 The Author(s)Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved. Citations and impact Subjectsbehaviourecology Large datasets are available through Biology Letters' partnership with Dryad

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call