Correction to: Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

Minji K Lee,Benjamin D Schalet,Amylou C Dueck,David Cella,Paul J Novotny,Jeff A Sloan,Kathleen J Yost

doi:10.1186/s41687-020-00280-z

Abstract

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Highlights

Depression: How much did feeling nothing could cheer you up interfere with activities?
Depression: What was the severity of feelings that nothing could 4.61 0.20 0.89 1.71 2.40 cheer you up at the worst?
In the Results section, ‘’98.8%’’ should be replaced with ‘’71.2%’’ in the sentence “Breast cancer, lymphoma/myeloma, colorectal cancer, head/neck/gastroesophageal cancer, and lung cancer made up 98.8% of the patients”

Summary

Open Access

Correction to: Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). – For the cell that corresponds to “Pain Intensity (PRO-CTCAE)” and “SL A”, the correct number is 1.58 rather than 1.20;. – For the very cell on the right that corresponds to “Pain Intensity (PRO-CTCAE)” and “SL B”, the correct number is − 0.26 rather than − 1.04.

Anxiety interference

Findings

Sleep severity