Abstract

You have accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Brans Kristien I., Govaert Lynn, Engelen Jessie M. T., Gianuca Andros T., Souffreau Caroline and De Meester Luc 2017Correction to ‘Eco-evolutionary dynamics in urbanized landscapes: evolution, species sorting and the change in zooplankton body size along urbanization gradients’Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B3722016054020160540http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0540SectionYou have accessCorrectionCorrection to ‘Eco-evolutionary dynamics in urbanized landscapes: evolution, species sorting and the change in zooplankton body size along urbanization gradients’ Kristien I. Brans Kristien I. Brans Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Lynn Govaert Lynn Govaert Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Jessie M. T. Engelen Jessie M. T. Engelen Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Andros T. Gianuca Andros T. Gianuca Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Caroline Souffreau Caroline Souffreau Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Luc De Meester Luc De Meester Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Kristien I. Brans Kristien I. Brans Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Lynn Govaert Lynn Govaert Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Jessie M. T. Engelen Jessie M. T. Engelen Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Andros T. Gianuca Andros T. Gianuca Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Caroline Souffreau Caroline Souffreau Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Luc De Meester Luc De Meester Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Published:05 April 2017https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0540This article corrects the followingResearch ArticleEco-evolutionary dynamics in urbanized landscapes: evolution, species sorting and the change in zooplankton body size along urbanization gradientshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0030 Kristien I. Brans, Lynn Govaert, Jessie M. T. Engelen, Andros T. Gianuca, Caroline Souffreau and Luc De Meester volume 372issue 1712Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences19 January 2017Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B372, 20160030. (Published online 5 December 2016) (doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0030)There is an error in §3c. ITVOTHER represents non-genetic phenotypic trait variation due to other environmental gradients or ontogenetic changes. The corrected paragraph is provided here.(c) The relative contribution of genotypic trait variation, non-genetic intraspecific trait variation and interspecific trait turnoverFor communities in which D. magna was present, a tendency towards an increased average community body size was detected with increasing levels of urbanization (figure 4a, 3200 m scale), similar to the pattern found for the total set of communities dominated by large species. Owing to the low number of communities, however, the full model was not significant (SPT + ITV, p = 0.423, electronic supplementary material, table SA6; for results without outlier removal, see the electronic supplementary material, table SB5 and figure SB8). ITV of D. magna explained 32.43% of the total observed trait turnover along the urbanization gradient (marginally non-significant, p = 0.056, electronic supplementary material, table SA6). ITV was clearly the larger contributor, explaining 95.78% of the total variation explained by both ITV and SPT together. Including genotypic trait values at 20°C and 24°C in the analysis enabled us to disentangle three types of ITV along the urbanization gradient: genotypic trait variation (GTV), non-genetic phenotypic trait variation due to increased temperatures (ITVPLAST-T) and non-genetic phenotypic trait variation due to other environmental gradients or ontogenetic changes (ITVOTHER; figure 4b). Only the latter component showed a significant contribution to the observed increase in average community body size (electronic supplementary material, table SA6, p = 0.047). ITVOTHER explained 92.89% of the total explained variation by all trait components, while GTV and SPT contributed 4.55% and 2.56%, respectively. Regression analysis on the difference in D. magna body size measurements on all individuals (i.e. including juveniles) versus adults only plotted against degree of urbanization, suggests that the large impact of ITVOTHER might be due to a change in relative abundance of juveniles along the urbanization gradient (β1 = 20.048, p = 0.032; electronic supplementary material, figure SA6). Previous Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsRelated articlesEco-evolutionary dynamics in urbanized landscapes: evolution, species sorting and the change in zooplankton body size along urbanization gradients19 January 2017Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences This Issue05 April 2017Volume 372Issue 1717Theme issue ‘Vision in dim light’ compiled and edited by David O'Carroll and Eric Warrant Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0540PubMed:28193824Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8436Online ISSN:1471-2970History: Published online05/04/2017Published in print05/04/2017 License:© 2017 The Author(s)Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved. Citations and impact Subjectsecology

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.