Correction to: Comparison of Outcomes at Time of Superior Cavopulmonary Connection Between Single Ventricle Patients With Ductal-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow Initially Palliated With Either Blalock-Taussig Shunt or Ductus Arteriosus Stent: Results From the Congenital Catheterization Research Collaborative

Abstract

HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 12, No. 11Correction to: Comparison of Outcomes at Time of Superior Cavopulmonary Connection Between Single Ventricle Patients With Ductal-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow Initially Palliated With Either Blalock-Taussig Shunt or Ductus Arteriosus Stent: Results From the Congenital Catheterization Research Collaborative Free AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUBCorrection to: Comparison of Outcomes at Time of Superior Cavopulmonary Connection Between Single Ventricle Patients With Ductal-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow Initially Palliated With Either Blalock-Taussig Shunt or Ductus Arteriosus Stent: Results From the Congenital Catheterization Research Collaborative Originally published19 Nov 2019https://doi.org/10.1161/HCV.0000000000000045Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019;12:e000045In the article by Meadows et al, “Comparison of Outcomes at Time of Superior Cavopulmonary Connection Between Single Ventricle Patients With Ductal-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow Initially Palliated With Either Blalock-Taussig Shunt or Ductus Arteriosus Stent: Results From the Congenital Catheterization Research Collaborative,” which appeared in the October 2019 issue of the journal (Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e008110. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008110), corrections were needed.In the Results section of the Abstract the sentence “Preoperative hemodynamics and overall pulmonary atresia growth were similar, although right pulmonary artery growth was better with DAS (change in z-score: 1.57 versus 0.65, P=0.026)” should be “Preoperative hemodynamics and overall pulmonary artery growth were similar, although right pulmonary artery growth was better with DAS (change in z-score: 1.57 versus 0.65, P=0.026).”In the Conclusions section of the Abstract, the sentence “Both groups demonstrated good pulmonary atresia growth” should be “Both groups demonstrated good pulmonary artery growth.”Additionally, Figures 1 and 2 were incorrect. Figure 1 should have been Figure 2, and Figure 2 should have been Figure 1, and both were missing units of “(Months)” on the x axis.This correction has been made to the article, which is available at: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008110. Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails November 2019Vol 12, Issue 11 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2019 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/HCV.0000000000000045 Originally publishedNovember 19, 2019 PDF download Advertisement