Abstract
HomeStrokeVol. 48, No. 3Correction to: Clinical Selection Strategies to Identify Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion: Results From SITS-ISTR (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry) Free AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCorrectionPDF/EPUBCorrection to: Clinical Selection Strategies to Identify Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion: Results From SITS-ISTR (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry) Originally published1 Mar 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000123Stroke. 2017;48:e95This article corrects the followingClinical Selection Strategies to Identify Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Anterior Vessel OcclusionIn the article by Scheitz et al, “Clinical Selection Strategies to Identify Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion: Results From SITS-ISTR (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry),” which published online ahead of print January 13, 2017, and appears in the February 2017 issue of the journal (Stroke. 2017;48:290–297. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014431), a correction is needed.On page 290, in the Abstract, the sentence read “Addition of abnormal gaze–face–arm–speech–time (G-FAST) or high scores on other simplified stroke scales increased specificity,” has been changed to read “Addition of the item best gaze to the original FAST score (G-FAST) or high scores on other simplified stroke scales increased specificity.”On page 290, the correspondence E-mail address read “[email protected],” has been changed to read “[email protected]”On page 291, right column, fourth line read “Because the NIHSS item best gaze is missing in the typical FAST algorithm but strongly associated with LAVO,21,26–28 we tested the hypothesis that adding the abnormal gaze–face–arm–speech–time (G-FAST) may improve its predictive value,” has been changed to read “Because the NIHSS item best gaze is missing in the typical FAST algorithm but strongly associated with LAVO,21,26–28 we tested the hypothesis that adding the item best gaze to FAST (G-FAST) may improve its predictive value.”This correction has been made to the current online version of the article, which is available at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/48/2/290. Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesClinical Selection Strategies to Identify Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Anterior Vessel OcclusionJan F. Scheitz, et al. Stroke. 2017;48:290-297 March 2017Vol 48, Issue 3 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000123PMID: 28242807 Originally publishedMarch 1, 2017 PDF download Advertisement
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
