Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160964.].
Highlights
There is an error in the second sentence of the Abstract
There is an error in the sixth sentence of the Conclusions section: The correct sentence is: In addition, the involvement of sulfuric acid from coal related industries had a significant impact on the carbon evolution along the Beipan River
The authors have provided a corrected version here
Summary
There is an error in the second sentence of the Abstract. The correct sentence is: Carbonate dissolution and soil CO2 were regarded as the primary sources of DIC on the basis of δ13CDIC values which varied along the Nanpan and Beipan Rivers, from −13.9‰ to −8.1‰.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
