Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160964.].
Highlights
There is an error in the second sentence of the Abstract
There is an error in the sixth sentence of the Conclusions section: The correct sentence is: In addition, the involvement of sulfuric acid from coal related industries had a significant impact on the carbon evolution along the Beipan River
The authors have provided a corrected version here
Summary
There is an error in the second sentence of the Abstract. The correct sentence is: Carbonate dissolution and soil CO2 were regarded as the primary sources of DIC on the basis of δ13CDIC values which varied along the Nanpan and Beipan Rivers, from −13.9‰ to −8.1‰.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
