Abstract
We found some errors in Lemma 1 of our paper [...]
Highlights
We found some errors in Lemma 1 of our paper [1], we would like to make the following corrections: Instead of the following Lemma 1 [1]: Lemma 1
F dp(x3, x4) ≤ F(v) − τ; continuing in these way, we arrive at F dp(xn, xn+1) ≤ F(v) − lτ, whenever n = 2l or n = 2l + 1 for l ≥ 1
The rest of the proof is unaltered
Summary
We found some errors in Lemma 1 of our paper [1], we would like to make the following corrections: Instead of the following Lemma 1 [1]: Lemma 1. Al-Khod, Muscat, Oman; mohammad@squ.edu.om 3 Department of Mathematics and RINS, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea; smkang@gnu.ac.kr 4 Center for General Education, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan * Correspondence: ymahenmit@rediffmail.com Received: 25 March 2019; Accepted: 27 March 2019; Published: 8 April 2019
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
