Abstract
All of our previously published atmospheric N2O mixing ratio data must be divided by 1.07 to correct for an error that we have recently discovered in our 1975 N2O primary standard. This problem was uncovered during intercomparison of our electron‐capture, gas‐chromatographic measurement technique for N2O with a newly developed infrared absorption technique (Connell et al, 1980). The salient features of this intercomparison, the subsequent recalibration of our standards for N2O, CFCl3, and CF2Cl2, and the consequences of the correction required for our N2O data are summarized here.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
