Abstract

In the original version of the paper [...]

Highlights

  • In the original version of the paper [1], a regression weight was assigned to the wrong cross-lagged path in Figure 1

  • A correct version of the figure can be taken from this correction

  • This correction does not change the conclusions drawn in the article, as the text portions of the manuscript correctly report the regression weights

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the original version of the paper [1], a regression weight was assigned to the wrong cross-lagged path in Figure 1 (bottom). Correction: Mahler et al Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science: How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development?

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call