Abstract
In the original version of the paper [...]
Highlights
In the original version of the paper [1], a regression weight was assigned to the wrong cross-lagged path in Figure 1
A correct version of the figure can be taken from this correction
This correction does not change the conclusions drawn in the article, as the text portions of the manuscript correctly report the regression weights
Summary
In the original version of the paper [1], a regression weight was assigned to the wrong cross-lagged path in Figure 1 (bottom). Correction: Mahler et al Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science: How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have