Correction Factor Method As A Substitute For Sequential Construction Analysis Of Buildings

Abstract

Abstract: Within the sphere of structural analysis, a method of paramount importance emerges - the Correction Factor Method. Unlike conventional approaches, this method stands as a stalwart against the complexities of non-linear structural behavior. It pioneers a path that diverges from the linear norm, offering precision and insight where others falter. The structural parts of the building are analyzed in one step using linear static analysis method by assuming that the structure will be subjected to full load after the finishing of the construction completely. In reality things work in other way the dead load from each structural members and finishing materials are imposed in different stages as the structure is constructed storey by storey. Similarly the stability of frame changes at every stage of construction. Because of this changes the loads assumed in conventional analysis vary in the construction process and the results obtained in the traditional analysis will be unstable. Thus the structural frame should be analyzed in every structural construction stage by keeping variation of loads. This process is called as Construction Stage Analysis this process considers all the uncertainties precisely. This process is a time consuming process as the analysis is a complex process. Thus Correction factor method can be introduced where the analysis time can be reduced and the results will be accurate to Construction Stage Analysis. In this project multistoried reinforced concrete building frames with different number of floors are analyzed using ETABS, and then Construction Stage Analysis of each building model is done. A comparative study of Bending moments, axial forces, twisting moments and shear forces are carried out at every stage of the structural frame. These values are compared with linear static analysis and Construction Stage Analysis. From the values obtained correction factors are derived. From this method we can get results which has a maximum error of 2% and this proves that correction factor can be used as a substitute for sequential construction analysis